Philip Stanier, Live Art Magazine
This review comes in two parts: 1. A concise review of the performance by myself and 2. Anna Krzystek’s responses to some questions I asked her by email which I thought were of value when placed alongside the review. 1.
This was something special. A white gallery studio with a table, a chair and a radio tuned to static. One performer dressed in black walks in the space looking at the audience and the room around her, mostly scanning and occasionally looking at something or someone. She stops moving for a moment and then slowly and precisely performs a clear move. What followed were a sequence of durations, some in which she performed a move, or was moving, or was just there. This was the piece and nothing else, at one point the static on the radio changed, this was a major event. The first time her hands twitched seemed like a massive flourish.
The piece was demanding on the audience, we spent our time glued to our seats craning forwards, focused on every tiny detail. The movement while done with clarity and precision, was not what I was really paying attention to. I was watching and experiencing the movement’s relation to time. Time was altered by the piece, in each moment I was aware of my personal sense of time changing, moving in and out of synch with the white walls of the space, the white noise of the radio, the audience and Krzystek. It was Krzystek’s presence, movement and her negotiation of time through her movement that achieved this.
What was distinct about the performance was that it was not timeless but time-full, and it hinted at temporal endlessness. Any moment in the performance could have stretched out in our experience without limit, and that we might have never moved to the next section, or that that moment might still exist now without end.
The experience of ‘Test the Wait’ demonstrated Bersgon’s observation that time is made up of durations, units that expand and contract in relation to each other. Some time into the performance I checked my watch (finding it difficult to pull my eyes away from the stillness), thinking the performance must nearly be over. I was surprised and delighted to find that only fifteen minutes had passed. Kryzstek had done what I had seen no one else do for a long time. She had managed to make the experience of an enjoyable performance pass slowly rather than quickly.
Usually we observe that something enjoyable seems to happen too quickly for our liking and that bad experiences seem to take forever. The full-length version will be at the CCA in October. I’m thinking of travelling to Glasgow just to see it.
© Philip Stanier.
2.
ON TIME
" Throughout the piece time does become manipulated, stretched and condensed, but all the while there's a very even paced regularity that keeps the piece moving along. To tap into the quality of endlessness”
ON THE IDEA OF 'PRE'
" The density stems from the sparseness of the piece and from working with the concept of "pre". The piece, as you saw it, was thirty minutes in duration and yet I wanted it to seem endless. I, as the performer, am alone on 'stage' - there's nothing else other than the sound of the radio static to keep the audience's attention. Keeping the audience engaged in the work and providing a sense of infinite timelessness. Working with the idea of "pre" allows me to embody & present a state of being - that of waiting - while the temporal shifts allows the audience to engage in the work. On occasions it's necessary to witness & experience something that happens fast in order to focus on something subtle and visa versa. At other moments it's not important to witness anything at all as perhaps the sound moves to the foreground of attention. The somewhat strict temporal structures I choose are there to provide the viewer with freedom to compose their own variations of what they see and don't see, hear and don't hear."
THE QUIET PERFORMER
"The notion of developing a 'quiet' presence derived from wanting to challenge myself as a solo performer. The movement phrases in the piece are incredibly spare and precise. There's no excess or surplus movement. I am essentially performing very close to my audience, we are in the same room and share the same space, I can observe my audience as much as they observe me, (especially during the sitting at the table sequence), and because of this I wanted to develop an intimate quality. The preciseness demands a lot of concentration and I'm forced to stay very much in the moment and complete everything fully before moving to the next; and as I perform I have to be incredibly patient with myself. This level of immersion allows me to keep close to myself while at the same time command the attention of those watching."
WHITE SPACE / WHITE NOISE
" I was interested in creating this piece for a white space because I felt it necessary for the piece to be stripped of the obviousness of "theatre" whereby the audience cannot sit comfortably in the dark. In a white space the audience are forced to acknowledge their presence. Acknowledge themselves watching and listening and also being watched and listened to.
The white noise came about through associated thoughts relating to "pre". The static is neither one radio station nor another, it occupies an in-between state. The radio also provides an element of chance; the static can shift at any time. What seems to be an empty sound, a sound that represents "nothing", is actually very active, the subtle nuances and unexpected shifts are very powerful. I suppose in many ways they are very much connected and share a similar kind of "whiteness" - they both provide a place where the unexpected can be experienced."
Anna Krzystek.
|